Police contact with a man and a woman before he murdered her - Sussex Police, August 2016

Published 03 Sep 2019
Investigation

We investigated the contact Sussex Police had with a woman and a man before he went on to kill her in August 2016. The man was later found guilty of the woman’s murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Our investigation found that the woman had reported to Sussex Police that the man was stalking her in February 2016. The man was given words of advice over his behaviour. In March 2016 Sussex Police received a report that the man had allegedly assaulted the woman. When it was revealed that the woman had been in a relationship with the man after initially denying it, an officer warned her about wasting police time. Over the following months, she reported further incidents regarding the man, included him stealing her house key and entering her bedroom. Sussex Police never arrested the man on suspicion of stalking.

During the investigation, we found indications of possible misconduct or gross misconduct for 14 police staff and officers, who all provided evidence. Our investigators also interviewed multiple witnesses, some from within Sussex Police, and others who were personally known to the woman. They carefully analysed the response of Sussex Police to the man and the woman, against local policies, College of Policing guidance, and legislation.

Our investigation showed that police officers and staff reported feeling ill prepared to deal with allegations of stalking, and that training was not provided by Sussex Police to deal specifically with this issue. We made a number of learning recommendations to the force, as well as two national recommendations (see below).

Based on the evidence available, and after discussion with Sussex Police, three officers attended disciplinary proceedings.

One officer was found to have a case to answer for misconduct for not giving the woman an opportunity to respond to allegations made by the man and giving her ‘words of advice’ about wasting police time, and for failing to consider force policies on domestic abuse. As the officer was no longer serving, no further action was taken.

Another officer was found to have a case to answer for gross misconduct for not complying with force policy regarding protection from harassment and domestic abuse, failing to adequately address prevalent issues while dealing with the woman, and for failing to respond to a report made by the woman. The officer would have been dismissed had they still been a member of a police force. Their name was placed on the police barred list.

A third officer was given a written warning at a misconduct meeting after being found to have committed misconduct for not taking past incidents, or the domestic context of the woman’s allegations, into consideration when deciding on police course of action.

Three more officers received management action.

We completed our investigation in June 2018 but waited until all disciplinary proceedings had completed, in summer 2019, before publishing its outcomes.

 

IOPC reference

2016/071948
Date of recommendation
Date response due

Recommendations