Man dies after becoming unwell in custody - Essex Police, November 2017

Published 20 Nov 2019
Investigation

On 19 November 2017, Essex Police stopped a man in South Ockendon. He was searched, then his vehicle was searched, and he was arrested for possession of class A drugs with the intent to supply. The man was taken to Grays custody suite and placed in a holding cell. A short time later the man became unwell. The custody sergeant called for a medical professional to see him. The medical professional and the officers carried out first aid, and an ambulance was called. The man was taken to hospital, where he later died. A post-mortem concluded the man had died from cocaine toxicity.

During the investigation, investigators collected CCTV, witness statements, and policies. Forensic analysis on some evidence was also conducted. There was no CCTV footage or body-worn video footage of the search.

During the investigation, conduct was identified for two of the officers involved relating to the search of the man and risk assessment, and the handling of evidence. We interviewed both under misconduct caution.

Evidence indicated that drugs were recovered from the man’s car. A tin containing drugs was later found in the man’s holding cell. Following the man’s death a ripped plastic bag was found in his jacket pocket that contained traces of drugs, and what appears to be the other half of the plastic bag was found in the rear of the police car that the man had been transported in.

Based on the evidence available, we were of the opinion that a reasonable tribunal, properly directed, could find, on the balance of probabilities, that one officer’s search of the man had not been thorough; that the officer’s risk assessment may have been flawed, as the man appeared to have ingested cocaine during his search and arrest; and that the officer may have failed to provide adequate care and attention to the man by leaving him unattended. We were of the view that there was sufficient evidence upon which a reasonable tribunal, properly directed, could find gross misconduct for the officer.

We found no indication of misconduct for the other officer regarding their handling of evidence.

We completed our investigation in August 2018. We also made some learning recommendations to the force (see below).

After reviewing our report Essex Police determined that the officer had a case to answer for misconduct only.

After the inquest into the man’s death had taken place, in spring 2019, Essex Police revised their determination to no case to answer for the officer. We recommended to Essex Police that they reassess their case to answer to misconduct, which the force agreed to, after additional exchange of views.

The officer attended a misconduct meeting in autumn 2019. At the meeting, the chair of the panel found the allegations that the officer had failed to take into consideration the potential risks and to adequately search the man to be not proven.

The chair of the panel found the allegation that the officer had not provided the man with adequate care and attention to be proven. The officer received a first written warning.

IOPC reference

2017/095210
Date of recommendation
Date response due

Recommendations

Tags
  • Essex Police
  • Custody and detention
  • Death and serious injury